The Dog’s Way Training Course
Description:
With professional dog trainer Sean McDaniel
I distilled 20 years of experience training people and dogs into this step-by-step program that you can follow at home.
Your dog is not over stimulated by food treat training
Your dog only responds when he is treated
with your dog allowing you to take advantage of his natural desire to follow a leader
that confuse the relationship and undermine your training
And permanent rules so your dog clearly knows the best way to live with you
As the core or your relationship, so you can form a more organic social relationship with your dog
Raj is a great herd guardian in business style. Carlin got him from a real working farm in Washington state and found that living with him in a tiny house in Seattle became problematic.
Raj is a great herd guardian in business style. Carlin got him from a real working farm in Washington state and found that living with him in a tiny house in Seattle became problematic. I’m starting to lose control of him as he’s a year old and close to a hundred pounds! She has tried many dog training books, and seen a lot of information on TV and on the internet, trying to learn how to train her growing dog more. She was “at the end of her rope”!
Cindy had her period when she was seven months pregnant, expecting her first child. Delta was very energetic, out of control, and charismatic around the people who would visit the house.
Cindy had her period when she was seven months pregnant, expecting her first child. Delta was very energetic, out of control, and charismatic around the people who would visit the house. Cindy and her husband couldn’t imagine having an out of control dog and a newborn baby at the same time. Delta also had a tennis ball obsession. She would actively snatch the ball out of their hands, sometimes catching her fingers in the process, and once she had a ball in her mouth, you couldn’t get her to give it away for anything! Cindy and her husband decided that training probably wouldn’t work for Delta because, as they put it, “Delta was a different kind of dog!”
Jenny has two dogs, but Cooper was her priority because he was so skittish and fearless. He wasn’t listening or interested in responding to the food at all.
Jenny has two dogs, but Cooper was her priority because he was so skittish and fearless. He wasn’t listening or interested in responding to the food at all. In fact, she’s tried, unsuccessfully, to teach Cooper to lie down on command with treats. Jenny admitted to us that she decided Cooper was just the kind of dog that wouldn’t be able to learn “down there.” Jenny felt that having two untrained dogs was a huge mess for their family.
Laura has three dogs but wanted to focus on Jake because, as she described him, he was a “basket bag.”
Laura has three dogs but wanted to focus on Jake because, as she described him, he was a “basket bag.” He had a short attention span, pulled on the leash terribly and “loses his mind” when getting ready for a walk or going to the park. Just walking the dogs was an ordeal for both Laura and her husband. Laura took Jake and her mixologist George through the program.
Jared had a lot of background handling dogs at shows and felt he could train a pit bull. However, Jared was having a really hard time walking Cleeney without a hard pull on the leash.
Jared had a lot of background handling dogs at shows and felt he could train a pit bull. He admitted to us that he really wanted some help because there were certain things he couldn’t get Kleiny to learn. His first goal was to teach Kleiny to walk on a loose leash without pulling!
Julie has an energetic wheat terrier (to say the least). This breed is known for what is called the “wheat salute,” which means that these dogs frantically jump up at anyone they meet.
Start enjoying a more relaxing walk with your dog tomorrow!
Downloadable and printable reminder cards
Downloadable and printable workbook to augment each video lesson
30 DAY MONEY BACK GUARANTEE!
Check out short clips from some of the early lessons to see what you get inside the video course from The Dog’s Way
(One-time payment and no recurring fees!)
It is important to me that the course is right for you. Here are some of the questions people have emailed me that account for the bulk of the questions I get (and my answers to). If your question is not answered here, feel free to email me.
There are specific scenarios and other lessons that are covered in mini-lessons in the Students section of the login portion of the website. For example, there are mini-tutorials on things like:
The online video course includes:
The downloadable workbook includes files
In short – no. A better “sales pitch” would probably be to simply say, “Hey, use this video course for every dog situation no matter what.” However, it’s kind of my pet peeve (no pun intended) when someone watches a TV show, reads a book (or watches a video course) and tries to rehabilitate a dog dealing with aggression issues. Not that much of the content and exercises aren’t likely to be useful and similar to how we approach clients personally in these situations. Some aggression issues really can be very serious, and my recommendation is that anyone with a dog who displays aggression should consult with a trained professional so that the behaviorist or trainer can evaluate your dog and determine the level of risk associated with it. Having other people or animals around a dog deals with these issues.
There are a lot of “only positive” coaches who classify people who don’t train in their method as “unscientific”. Often, it is a form of PR persuasion against coaches who simply disagree with them. You may also hear versions of this criticism directed at balanced trainers (who use fair and consistent positive and negative feedback with dogs), as being “old-fashioned.” These criticisms are designed to portray the “only positive” coaches as; Good, smart, humane, scientific, fresh. At the same time, they try to portray balanced trainers as: bad, stupid, inhumane, unscientific and old-fashioned (and I almost forgot – offensive). It’s a clever way to frame the issue, for sure. The only problem is that it’s not entirely accurate or factual.
I heard a lot of this kind of discussion early on in my career because I was originally trained in a “purely positive” method of dog training. I’ve heard there’s only one way to train a dog, “Our way or the wrong way!” I have noticed that while the purely positive method works for a very small number of dogs, most dogs cannot become functional in real-life situations with a purely positive method of training. When I began to question some of the tenets of the “purely positive” method, I was met with all the enthusiasm of someone pondering the idea that perhaps the Earth might already have orbited the Sun in about 1500 in Europe. Fortunately, for me, I’ve also been volunteering at shelters that help exercise and bond with dogs after hours. I noticed during the social interactions between the dogs that they used positive and negative feedback with each other all the time. That’s when the light bulb went out for me. The weird thought in my head was, “I guess dogs have never read the book Purely Positive Canine Communication… because that’s not how they do it?”
I think the implication when some coaches call other coaches unscientific, uneducated, or abusive is that somehow these “bad” coaches don’t understand the benefits of “positive reinforcement.” I don’t know of any coaches who would refuse to use positive reinforcement in training. Balanced Coaches use positive and negative feedback in a full range of communications with an emphasis on getting the functional outcome in everyday life.
To be clear, I admire people who live their lives the way they want to live, and if people want to train in a “purely positive” way or a “purely psychological” way or any other version of dog training, and they seem to get the results they’re looking for, I think that’s it. good. All I can do is tell you what conclusions I came to and why I ended up there.
So, perhaps I can respond to the “unscientific” charge in this way. Let’s do a quick test. Which type of coach do you think is more unscientific?
As I’m sure many of you know, the scientific method is relatively straightforward and has been around for a few centuries now. which is next:
So, knowing that, which type of dog trainer is more “scientific” and which type is more “unscientific?”
A coach who has a specific strict theoretical ideology, and when faced with a lack of results, when trying to put those theories into practice, does not re-examine his theories and assumptions, but instead spends a lot of energy throwing doubts at people who do not strictly follow their ideology.
The trainer, who thinks it’s OK for different people to train dogs differently, has an open framework and uses the many training techniques available to them. They go through the aforementioned “scientific method” testing process continually with a focus on modifying techniques and strategies until results are achieved with each dog.
I’ll let you decide which trainer looks more “scientific”. 😊
ClickBank is the retailer of the products on this site. CLICKBANK® is a registered trademark of Click Sales Inc. Inc., a Delaware corporation located at 1444 S. Entertainment Ave., Suite 410 Boise, ID 83709, USA and used with permission. ClickBank’s role as a retailer does not constitute an endorsement, approval, or review of these products or any claim, statement, or opinion used in promotion of these products.
Copyright © document.write(new Date().getFullYear()); dog way
Click here to get The Dog’s Way Training Course at discounted price while it’s still available…
All orders are protected by SSL encryption – the highest industry standard for online security from trusted vendors.
The Dog’s Way Training Course is backed with a 60 Day No Questions Asked Money Back Guarantee. If within the first 60 days of receipt you are not satisfied with Wake Up Lean™, you can request a refund by sending an email to the address given inside the product and we will immediately refund your entire purchase price, with no questions asked.